S04 E01
In this episode of CultureClub X powered by CultureMonkey, host Diana Blass chats with HR leader Melinda Honcoop about culture-backed onboarding. They discuss strategies for remote onboarding, 30-60-90 day plans, Gen Z expectations, and how culture directly shapes employee experience and retention.
TL;DR
What does it actually take to make a new hire feel valued before they have even logged in for day one? In the season four opener of CultureClub X, powered by CultureMonkey, host Diana Blass sits down with Melinda Honcoop, interim head of People Ops at care.com and founder of Agile in HR, an HR advising and consultancy, to dig into culture-backed onboarding and how it boosts candidate and employee experience.
Melinda brings two decades of people leadership to the conversation. She has been chief people officer at TCP Software and has held HR leadership roles at brands like Spiceworks-Ziff Davis, HomeAway.com, Blackbaud and Expedia. A self-described true at heart people nerd, she went to university intending to go into social work and found that workplaces needed a social work lens too.
Her core belief frames the whole episode: healthier workplaces make a healthier society, and onboarding is one of the most important yet overlooked parts of the employee lifecycle in which to build them. Across six questions, she and Diana cover remote onboarding, the 30-60-90 plan, Gen Z expectations, the role of senior leaders, onboarding technology, and the link between culture and hiring.
Melinda's first move is to reframe the timeframe. Through automation and sheer busyness, onboarding often shrinks to a first day of signing paperwork and getting to know the company a little bit. She argues for taking it from a first day compliance activity to a two way conversation with the employee, one that is tailored to the individual rather than one size fits all.
That means learning who the person is, the strengths and personality they bring, and creating connection before they even start. Get the administrative first day activities done in advance, so the actual first day is about connection: what the role expects, what the first 30, 60 and 90 days will focus on, and how the manager defines success and impact.
In practice, Melinda starts by asking what her new employees look like, building what she calls user personas. A survey, a questionnaire or an insights assessment captures communication style and working preferences, which are then mapped against the team's own assessments and shared in advance, so manager and employee can have a natural conversation before day one.
There's so much data that shows that the first 90 days really make a difference.
The tailoring extends across career stages. Someone in their first job may need the nuts and bolts, help knowing what questions to ask a manager, even YouTube videos to prepare in advance. A senior executive needs the opposite: a first week of prepared stakeholder meetings, so they are not scrambling to work out their role and key stakeholders on their own.
Asked how critical onboarding is to the entire employee lifecycle, Melinda pushes back on the framing that onboarding is only a first welcome for external hires. If organizations reskill and upskill their talent, people get promoted and transfer into new roles and new teams. Those transitions deserve an onboarding experience too, and she says this is often missed, especially for new managers moving into management roles.
The same applies to mergers and acquisitions. When a company welcomes a whole new organization into its growth plan, applying onboarding thinking to that moment helps create something combined and new together. Put onboarding across the moments that matter in the journey, she argues, and you unlock incredible opportunities to make a difference.
The mechanism she favors is not a bulky career development plan document that sits off to the side and no one ever looks at. Instead, she builds little capsules of conversation into the one-on-ones managers already have: not just today's work, but what the employee wants to be doing six months or a year from now, and which cross-functional projects could help them reskill toward it.
Melinda maps the 30-60-90 before the person even starts, ideally while writing the job description. Define what a fully functional person in the role looks like, then use the interview process to spot the gaps a candidate will bring with them. The first 90 days become a deliberate plan to develop that missing knowledge and experience.
The plan should move from knowledge acquisition to application: once someone has taken the knowledge in, what does it look like for them to actually produce with it in their day-to-day job? Breaking that into measurable milestones gives managers something concrete to track in one-on-ones, so they can see whether the person is ramping or not.
Hand holding is expected at first, but Melinda wants managers trained to know when it should wean off and the person should step fully into the role. And if the behavior is not changing, do not wait a year to say so. It does not feel good to miss expectations, which is why she points to companies like Notion moving away from annual performance conversations in favor of real-time ones.
Diana notes that younger generations are often labeled as too eager or unwilling to put the work in. Melinda's experience is different. Gen Z employees are not simply self-starting; they want a partnership with their manager and a map. Not a GPS that gets them there 100%, but a clear sense of how this role connects to what else is available in the organization.
So while the 30-60-90 focuses on getting someone up and running in the job today, for Gen Z it needs to be more than that. Melinda starts early conversations about mentors who can give exposure beyond the role, so a new hire can see what is next and build connection and community from the start.
And what a workplace offers is mentorship, is community, are people of different experiences. So why not unlock that early on for them?
That reframing matters. Many Gen Z employees could build solo careers, so the workplace has to offer what a solo path cannot: mentorship, community and people of different experiences. Unlocking that early is how organizations turn eager new joiners into committed ones.
Senior management involvement in onboarding is not about the direct supervisor. Melinda means skip levels: leaders above the immediate manager who can help remove the us versus them feeling and break down the glass layer between new hires and leadership. That connection is also, she notes, exactly what Gen Z wants.
A recorded welcome video is better than nothing, but a leader talking at someone is not a relationship. Melinda prefers small, informal groups, monthly or quarterly, where senior leaders meet new employees, talk about what they are working on, and leave time to hear insights back. New hires often carry perspective from experiences the leader has never had.
Timing matters too. She finds these sessions land best after someone has been there for 30 or 60 days, when their perspective is still fresh and they are not yet too deep in the weeds. The sessions also make leaders approachable: most have open doors, but new hires are afraid of the title until a real conversation breaks that barrier down.
With budgets tight in an uncertain economy, Melinda sees technology as the way to keep high-touch onboarding affordable. Automate the scheduling of onboarding meetings, run the pre-start assessments through a tool, track 30-60-90 plans in an automated system, and use survey tools to ask how onboarding is going and build baseline metrics.
Chatbots earn a specific mention. New hires ask IT, facilities and HR the same routine questions, and when humans answer them, they are pulled away from the strategic work they were hired to do. A centralized chatbot can give tailored, even location-specific answers while freeing the people team up.
The bigger prize is the data. Once onboarding runs through technology, you can quickly see whether you are hiring right. If people are not ramping within 90 days, the data points back to where the interview process missed something, creating an employee feedback loop that iterates recruitment. Managers are often siloed, Melinda says, and the data provides a signal they did not have before.
Melinda's answer to the final question starts from a definition: culture is made up of the individuals of the organization, how they interact and how they behave. If a company can codify the behaviors and decision processes it wants to amplify, it can build those behavior expectations into the interview process and hire to its culture.
That alignment is not soft. Value and behavior misalignments, she observes, are where performance often starts to become difficult. Organizations that can see success at that granular level simply hire better, which flows straight into retention, employer branding and advocacy.
You would never want an assessment to be the decision maker, right? It can be an informing piece, but often people may rely on it too much.
On culture-fit assessments, her caution is clear. Used too early or weighted too heavily, they risk undermining diversity, equity and inclusion. Used late, as one data point among three strong finalists, they can add a nuanced layer. Early in the process, she prefers simulating the real work environment in interviews and watching how candidates naturally behave with future team members.
Listen closely and every practice in this episode is a listening practice. User personas and pre-start assessments listen to who a new hire is. One-on-one career capsules listen to where they want to go. Skip-level sessions listen to their fresh perspective, and ramp-up data listens for the signals managers cannot see on their own.
That is the deeper argument underneath culture-backed onboarding: experience improves when organizations hear their people early and act on what they learn. It is the same principle that drives employee listening at every later stage of the lifecycle, from engagement surveys to exit conversations.
As Melinda puts it, healthier workplaces make a healthier society. Starting that health at the very first hello, before day one even begins, may be the most practical culture investment a people team can make this year.

About the guest
Head of People Ops, care.com
Melinda has a calling for people and creating healing workplace ecosystems. She has spent 20 years as a senior people leader and HR advisor for technology-focused companies. She has been the Chief People Officer at TCP Software and has held multiple HR leadership roles at brands like Spiceworks-Ziff Davis, HomeAway.com, Blackbaud, and Expedia to name a few.
She co-founded the Austin Women in Agile meetup and believes in passionately guiding organizational leaders to rethink how they work to thrive. Melinda is based in Austin, Texas and sits on the board of the non-profit, Love Justice International.
Season 04, Episode 01 · Melinda Honcoop with Diana Blass · 31 min
Hi everyone and welcome to the latest episode of Culture Club X powered by CultureMonkey. I'm your host, Diana Blass. CultureMonkey is a complete employee engagement platform that helps people leaders listen to their employees and enhance workplace cultures.
Culture Club X is our community initiative where global leaders share their experiences and discuss all things company culture. After the success of our last season, we're excited to kick off our fourth season with Melinda Honcoop, interim head of People Ops at care.com and founder of Agile in HR, an HR advising and consultancy. Welcome Melinda, we're stoked to have you with us today.
Thank you so much, it's exciting to be here.
Well, definitely excited to have you with us today to weigh on the topic, but first let's share a bit about your background with our viewers.
Melinda has a calling for people in creating healing workplace ecosystems. She spent 20 years as a senior people leader and HR advisor for technology focused companies. She's been the chief people officer at TCP Software and has held multiple HR leadership roles at brands like Spiceworks-Ziff Davis, HomeAway.com, Blackbaud and Expedia.
She co-founded the Austin Women in Agile meetup and believes in passionately guiding organizational leaders to rethink how they work to thrive. Melinda is based in Austin, Texas and sits on the board for the nonprofit Love Justice International. When she's not busy with people, she can be found reading, walking her dogs, traveling or hiking.
Melinda, it's our honor to have you with us today. Welcome again to Culture Club X's videocast on culture-backed onboarding, how it boosts candidate and employee experience. Before we begin, please tell us a bit more about yourself and your organization.
I am a true at heart people nerd and HR was the perfect profession. I went to university to go into social work and very much found that workplaces needed a social work lens to really understand where people start within an ecosystem and how to create healthier workplace ecosystems. And for me, my passion is I believe if we have healthier workplaces, we have a healthier society.
And I love connecting and being able to look within a workplace and seeing where there is that lack of alignment, that lack of community, in order to be able to come in and be able to find ways in which we can reconnect and ways we can rethink to build community. And I can't think of anything better than our topic today, which is onboarding in which to do that. It's a very important part of the employee lifecycle but often overlooked.
Definitely, and I love that you found a career path that fits so naturally with what you wanna do. Not everyone is lucky enough to find that passion right away, but we know the difference that it makes when you ultimately do find it and you're carrying out that passion every day. So that being said, I'm so excited to chat with you today. You're really the perfect person to speak on this topic. So let's get started.
The first question, how do you think leaders should rethink remote hire onboarding effectively so that new hires feel valued, engaged and connected equally to in-office employees?
This is such a good question and you could spend just an hour on this one question. Often through the automation process and through systems, you get so busy, it becomes that first day experience of signing paperwork, getting to know the company a little bit. And in order to rethink, often it's about what is that timeframe of onboarding, and taking it from just a first day compliance activity, and really how can we create a conversation, a two way conversation with the employee, that doesn't feel that it's a one size fits all, but it's really tailored to that individual.
Being able to get to understand who they are, the strengths and the personality that they're bringing with them, and being able to introduce ourselves to them, and being able to create that connection before they even start, and being able to get the first day activities done before they even enter in. And being able to have that first day really be about connection, and getting to know what are the expectations of my role, and what am I gonna be focused on in the first 30, 60, 90, and how does my manager see me coming into this organization, and what success is gonna look like, and the impact that I can make here.
And so from your experience at care.com or at your startup, what are some of those exercises that you do on a first day to get to that outcome?
Yeah, so really trying to find, first of all, being able to understand within our company, what do our new employees look like? What are those, what I like to call user personas, and what is our audience, and how are we tailoring the experience to them, and what is it that that person may need that someone else may not? And so making sure we don't have just a custom template that we send to everyone, that we really are getting to know people.
So how do we reach out, whether it's through a survey or a questionnaire or even through an insights assessment, where we're being able to get an understanding of what are their preferences around communication style, around working in a one team environment, and then how does that map to the assessment that the rest of the team members have made. And being able to share that information in advance, be able to have a natural conversation between the manager and the employee prior to that first day, and really being able to create a stronger bond there, in order to be able to get that level of engagement, and get these things out of the way so you can really hit the ground running. There's so much data that shows that the first 90 days really make a difference.
I think other things that we've done is being able to think, is this person new in their career? Do they need to understand some of the nuts and bolts? This is their first job? Are there some things that we can do to really help prep them to feel comfortable, and being able to understand what are some of those questions I should be asking, how do I have a conversation with my manager? 'Cause often if this is their first job, they don't know those things. So how might we be able to even provide some YouTube videos that help them prepare for that in advance.
Versus a senior leader and executive coming in, where most often they join and companies haven't introduced them to anyone. And so now they're scrambling, trying to figure out, first of all, what is my role? Who are my key stakeholders that I'm gonna need to engage with across the company, cross-functionally? If we're able to take some of that work out and really put the thoughtfulness in, and prep their schedule with prepared meetings, so when they come, they already have their first week planned for them in a way that's meaningful. It's not like you're taking them away and putting them in this class for a whole day, but really making these meaningful conversations that are gonna be impactful to help them in their role, and be able to get started off on the right foot. So these are some of the things, examples of things that I've done in prior companies.
Yeah, I love that. I like how it extends from the less personal ways through surveys and assessments, but then stretching all the way to exercises that you can do as a team or just YouTube videos, which I personally found to be so helpful when I have transitioned even the types of jobs I was working. Anything I could do to prepare in advance just helped that anxiety for me. So I love everything you mentioned there.
The second question, in your opinion, how critical is onboarding on the entire employee lifecycle? What should be the important focus area for employers, and why is it imperative for Gen Z employees?
Yeah, I love this one, because onboarding isn't just for our external hires coming in as their first welcome to the company. If we're looking at the entire employee lifecycle and the moments that matter most, our hope is always that as we reskill and upskill our talent, they're gonna be promoted into new jobs. So as they transfer into these roles, how are we taking the onboarding experience that we use for someone coming externally into our organization, to welcome someone already at the company into a new role, into a new team? I think this is often missed and overlooked, and so important, especially for new managers moving into management roles.
And also when we look at merger acquisition, as companies have that within their growth plan, how are we welcoming this new company and the employees into the organization, to create something combined and new together? So I think we can really think about, often we think about onboarding just for external as that first beginning journey of the employee lifecycle, but if we were to take that and put it across the moments that matter in that journey, and apply it to some of these other considerations, we could really unlock some incredible opportunities to really make a difference.
Definitely. I know just from my own experience, people even in my own circle, that you just want more communication on what the career path looks like, especially for Gen Z, who reportedly isn't really that incited by salaries and things like that. It's said they want to feel like they're gaining more personally from an experience.
Exactly, yeah. And often I think we do a good job of bringing in someone external to the organization, of having some conversations around, hey, you're new in this role, here's your career path. But as they then start to get promoted, we lose that additional touch and those additional conversations. And so how can we take that and apply it throughout their time at the company?
And is that something that you do during evaluations, or how often do you have these conversations with employees?
Yeah, I really try, when I launch having real time feedback between managers and employees, just that level of expectation. It's not just about the work that they're doing in their job today, but how are we taking those one-on-one conversations and making them meaningful, and really looking to not what we're just doing today in your current job, but what also do we want to be doing a year or even six months from now? And how can we start to think about cross-functional projects or experiences that are gonna help them reskill and upskill, and align that with their passion and their areas of interest, and opportunities that they're uncertain and how they can explore that.
And so how do we start to just put this into our everyday thinking and our mindset? So we don't have to have this big separate career development plan process, and this document that's created that sits off to the side and no one ever looks at, but how can we just create these little capsules of conversation in our one-on-ones and what we already do, to generate a conversation and start to create steps toward being able to gather those experiences, and be able to understand how do the strengths align to those, and is there a good match, and how to build on that through just the normal on-the-job experience?
Right, yeah. It seems like invaluable information and just training for a company to provide, given just the fight for talent today.
So moving on to the third question now, you mentioned the 30-60-90. So digging further into this process, how can managers outline goals in a 30-60-90 day onboarding plan, keeping the employee skills and expectations in mind, especially for Gen Z, who has an ever increasing expectation from the workplace?
Yeah, and this is something I really like to map out prior to that person even starting. So when we have that job description, we're thinking about even starting to hire that person, because you can start to include this in the interview process of, what does a fully functional person in this role look like? And knowing what are the areas that we know they're not going to have. And so how in that process, in the interview, where do we see some gaps? And so how can we think about, in the 30, 60 and 90, how can we start to develop that knowledge and that experience?
And then once they understand the knowledge, have taken it in, then what does it look like for them to actually produce and be able to utilize that knowledge in their day-to-day job? And so what is measurable that we're able to see, yes, they have this, they've got it, they've ramped up, and now they're fully functional. How do we break down those milestones within a 30-60-90, that we can then have conversations within our one-on-ones, to be able to see how that person is tracking or not?
And are we coaching as the manager and providing them, at first there's some hand holding, but we'd like to see that decrease over time. So often managers don't understand, when is that moment when the hand holding needs to start to wean off, and that person should really be stepping fully into the role? So I think that's also manager training, and helping them understand what does success look like, and how do we have those coaching, real-time conversations. And if we're not seeing that change in behavior, making sure we don't wait too long to have that, so that if we unfortunately didn't make a good hire, we're able to have a good conversation with the employee, 'cause it doesn't feel good when you know you're not meeting expectations. And so how can we be real about that up front, and not wait a year to have that conversation, which is why you see companies like Notion not having annual performance conversations.
And in regards to Gen Z, how is this process different compared to millennials or even older generations?
I often find that with the Gen Z versus millennials is they really want to be able to, it's not like they're just self-starting, right? They wanna understand and be able to have a partnership with the manager, be able to have a map. It's not like the map has to have the entire, it's not like the GPS that's gonna get you there 100%, but it's really understanding how does this then connect with what else is available here to me? What are the opportunities outside of just this role?
So 30, 60, 90, yes, that is focused in the today of how can we get you up in your job and running. But with Gen Z, it needs to be more than that with a 30, 60, 90. We also need to start having conversations with them early on of, hey, let's start to maybe have some mentors that are able to have exposure beyond just their role, being able to see, hey, what's next? And how can I start to create the connection and community, to not just learn how I can be successful in my role today, but also start to work on what is next, and be able to see what else is here in this organization.
It's really interesting to hear that perspective. I think often younger generations are just labeled as almost a step above interns, and maybe are too eager to work for themselves or to not put the work in, when really, as you're saying, they want more exposure to the company, more of an insight into how to progress and grow and play a bigger role, which is interesting.
And I think that's the value of work now, where many of the Gen Z, they could go and have their own solo careers. And what a workplace offers is mentorship, is community, are people of different experiences. So why not unlock that early on for them?
Definitely, especially in light of the value of branding. And I think everybody can have a brand, and how's that match with your culture brand. It's fascinating.
The next question, what part does senior management play in a smooth onboarding process? How can they create a diverse, inclusive and equitable environment for the future?
It's so important. I think this is also what Gen Z wants. These are those connections. These are those conversations. And when I think of senior leadership, I'm thinking like a skip level. This is not just the supervisor for the employee. It helps remove the us versus them. How can we start to break down that glass layer? And how do we include senior management within the onboarding process? Yes, they have busy schedules, but how can we in a meaningful way allow them to meet our new employees? Especially in a remote world where we don't even maybe know people, 'cause we're not walking down the hallway with each other.
And so how can they be able to help this new hire understand that part of the business, and how it ties into the greater strategic plan for the company, and how they see this person being able to add value to the work that they're doing, if it is in a different function than what this person was hired. And having the opportunity to get to know them. So often I find that you'll have the senior leadership in a YouTube video and they're just talking at someone. And that is good, it's better than not doing anything. But how can we create an actual two-way conversation, where that person actually feels that they took the time to get to know them and hear from them? 'Cause they may have some really great perspective that they're taking and bringing from an experience that that leader maybe hasn't had exposure to.
Right, and so what are some of those ways? Especially in the remote work world, what are some things that you do?
Yeah, so if you are hiring, being able to understand the time, that we create meaningful small groups. Maybe you do it monthly or quarterly, where the senior leaders will meet with new employees and be able to hold an informal conversation, being able to talk about what they're working on, but leave time to hear from people. What are their insights? I find these are often good after the person's been there for 30 or 60 days, and it's really neat to get that fresh perspective and their learnings before they get too much into the weeds. And I find that these conversations also help create a connection, so that these conversations continue. And most often these leaders have open doors and are very approachable, but because of the title, these new hires are afraid to reach out. They don't know how do we best communicate. So this is a way to break that down. So I find that those chats are really good, and because of fireside, it's too many people. We need to have the smaller, intimate settings.
Yeah, it sounds like in a way, with the remote work culture, it's become easier to set up these conversations, and forcing people to all meet up in a room. At least when you have a specific channel for these conversations, or a meeting set in a calendar, and it's so easy to just hop on, perhaps it's become easier to break that barrier a little bit.
Yes.
How can modern people leaders rely on technology to provide an optimum onboarding experience for new hires and ensure a reduction in drop-off rates?
Yeah, a lot of these onboarding tasks that we're talking about can be really time consuming, and especially moving into an uncertain economy in 2023, where our budgets are really tight, how can we utilize technology to automate some of these activities that we've been talking about? How can we automate the scheduling, for example? Is there a way to schedule these meetings and these conversations through technology? The assessments we are talking about, being able to do that through a tool. Being able to utilize onboarding technology to create conversations prior to the person starting, being able to utilize 30, 60, 90 planning through an automated tool, and be able to take that data and have a survey, how are we doing in this, create some baseline metrics. There's so many different ways that we can use technology.
I think even in the onboarding, we often have very basic questions that we're going to IT and facilities and to our HR teams to answer. But if a human is answering these more routine questions, it doesn't allow them to be freed up to focus on the actual strategic impact that they're hired to do. So how can we use chatbots to be able to provide a centralized place for employees to ask these questions, and they can actually get tailored answers that apply to their location? Some of the questions may have location-specific responses.
Wow, that's definitely, so many different ways that technology can be used, as you're pointing out. The chatbot sounds like it would have been a lifesaver for me when I moved into tech, for sure. But thinking about how technology perhaps has streamlined the process, would you say candidates become more familiar, faster with protocols? Are you finding future candidates more easily because you've gained so much data from an onboarding process? What outcomes have you gained?
Yeah, once you are able to implement some of these onboarding technologies, you can often find quickly, are we hiring right? If you're starting to see there is a disconnect, and there people aren't ramping within the 90 days, then being able to go back and have that real-time data and say, where in the interview process are we missing this? And be able to then align that learning to then iterate the recruitment process, so that we are making sure that we do a better job next time, and that we don't keep making the same mistakes. I think that is good feedback.
And often managers are siloed. If we don't have this information, they don't know what they don't know. And they don't know that maybe their intent is in the right place but the delivery is missing. Or they thought they understood the job description and what success would look like, but there's just something nuanced that they can't put their hands on, that the data is able to provide a signal that they didn't have before.
Yeah, I love that, that you can really see the way that we can complement our efforts with technology. You hate to think that tech can be smarter in lots of ways, but the data, it's really invaluable. And when paired together, it's great that you can find better candidates.
The last question here. Do you agree that company culture has a direct impact on a good candidate experience? How does this impact retention rates, employer branding and in building brand advocates?
Yeah, company culture is so complex. You could probably spend an hour just on this conversation, but it's so important, because culture is made up of the individuals of the organization, and how they interact and how they behave. And so as an organization, what are those behaviors and those decision processes that you want to amplify in support of how we work together better? And if we're able to actually codify that and name it, and be able to then clarify those behavior expectations, we now could then put these into the interview process, and be able to hire then to that culture, so that we're really then aligning that individual and their strengths with the organization's strengths and behavior expectations.
'Cause often when you find those value misalignments, those behavior misalignments, is when you often start to see the performance start to become more difficult. And so I find, with organizations that are really good at being able to see success down to that granular level, they hire better.
And you mentioned earlier surveys and assessments, the value there, and the predictive index came to mind for me. Is that something that you do to understand whether a future candidate fits into the culture, or is that something you do later once they're hired?
Yeah, assessments is a tricky one within the hiring process. You would never want an assessment to be the decision maker, right? It can be an informing piece, but often people may rely on it too much. And then I worry about, are we missing the diversity, equity and inclusion in doing that? And so we need to be really mindful at what point are we implementing this assessment. And so often I think later can be better, and being able to make an informed decision. Maybe you have the final three candidates and they're all really strong and really good, and maybe that assessment provides one of the data points, never the final ultimate decision, but maybe that nuanced layer that's able to help you know that out of these three incredible candidates, which one aligns the best.
And so what are some things you do early on in the hiring process to see if somebody's a culture fit?
It's through being able to have work experiences, being able to simulate as much as possible how would that person be working with the team members. And I think the better we can get at simulating the work environment within the interview, then we start to see how they naturally behave, how they naturally are working through the process, their decision making. How are they showing up in that interview with the other team members?
Yeah, definitely. Well, thank you so much for your time today. That was such an incredible assessment, Melinda. Your perspective on this evolving topic is so unique and interesting. Culture-based onboarding of new employees is certainly a critical factor in ensuring high productivity, engagement, and retention.
With CultureMonkey, leaders can gauge employee sentiments and provide managers with personalized, action-oriented insights effectively. So visit CultureMonkey.io to see how you can improve your workplace culture today. With that, we conclude this episode of Culture Club X, powered by CultureMonkey. Thank you, Melinda. That was such a wonderful chat. Let our viewers know how they can connect with you to share their thoughts or just have a quick chat.
Please reach out to me on LinkedIn. I love hearing from people. Melinda Roberts Honcoop. And I do respond to most messages. I may be a little bit slow, LinkedIn can get pretty busy, but I love meeting new people, and happy to answer questions or dig deeper into anything we talked about today. Thank you so much for having me. It was such an honor to be here.
Well, that's all we have for you in this episode of Culture Club X, powered by CultureMonkey. Until next time, I'm your host, Diana, signing off.
Melinda Honcoop recommends building user personas for new employees and reaching out before day one with a survey, questionnaire or insights assessment that captures communication style and working preferences. Mapping those results against the team's assessments and sharing them in advance lets the manager and new hire have a natural conversation before the first day.
She also suggests completing first day paperwork in advance, so day one itself is about connection, role expectations and what the first 30, 60 and 90 days will look like.
Yes. Melinda argues onboarding is often wrongly treated as a welcome for external hires only. Promotions, role transfers, new managers stepping into management, and employees joining through mergers and acquisitions are all moments that matter in the employee lifecycle, and applying onboarding practices to them creates belonging and unlocks opportunities that most companies miss.
Start before the hire: define what a fully functional person in the role looks like, then use the interview process to identify the gaps a candidate will arrive with. Build the 30-60-90 around developing that knowledge, then applying it measurably in the day-to-day job, with milestones reviewed in regular one-on-ones.
Managers should coach in real time, understand when early hand holding needs to wean off, and raise concerns quickly rather than waiting for an annual review if someone is not ramping.
No. Melinda is clear that an assessment should never be the decision maker; it can inform a decision but over-relying on it risks harming diversity, equity and inclusion. Used late in the process, it can be one data point that helps distinguish between strong final candidates.
Earlier in the process, she prefers simulating the real work environment in interviews, so hiring teams can watch how candidates naturally behave and make decisions with future team members.
Senior leaders, at a skip level above the direct manager, help remove the us versus them barrier for new hires. Melinda recommends small, informal group sessions monthly or quarterly, where leaders share what they are working on and leave time to hear from new employees, ideally after they have been in the company for 30 to 60 days. These two way conversations connect new hires to the company strategy and make leadership approachable.
Every new episode, plus the takeaways that matter, posted on the CultureMonkey LinkedIn page as soon as they drop.
Free on LinkedIn. Unfollow anytime.