55+ Employee communication survey questions for 2026

An employee communication survey measures how well information flows through your company. Get 55+ questions across six dimensions, benchmarks, and the Cascade Gap test.

The SIGNAL model
Six things communication must get right
S01 to S10
Sent

Whether a message physically reaches each person on a channel they actually check, not one they ignore.

Written by
Dhanya Satheesh, Content Marketer at CultureMonkey
Dhanya Satheesh · Content Marketer50+ published articles on employee engagement, workplace culture, and the evolving world of work. Turns HR research into practical guidance teams can act on.
Data reviewed by
People Science Team10M+ anonymized data points verified across 15+ industries globally.
Published / Updated
Updated First published Sep 2026 · 14 min read
TL;DR
  • What it is: An employee communication survey is a structured questionnaire that measures how well information moves through an organization, not how satisfied employees feel.
  • What it measures: It covers six dimensions, the SIGNAL model, namely whether a message is Sent, Intelligible, Grounded, timely (Now), Applicable, and open to a Loop.
  • How long and how often: Most teams run a quarterly pulse of 12 to 20 questions that takes under five minutes to complete.
  • What counts as a good response rate: A desk-based communication survey is strong above 80%, while 45% can be a strong result for frontline and deskless teams.
  • The most common trap: Company-average scores hide a cascade gap, and a gap wider than 15 points between executives and frontline means the message is dying at the manager layer, not the channel.

What is an employee communication survey?

An employee communication survey is a structured questionnaire that measures how clearly, quickly and credibly information moves between leadership, managers and employees. It is diagnostic, not motivational: it tells you where messages break, not how people feel about their job.

Unlike a broader employee communication program or an engagement survey, this instrument is narrow on purpose. It isolates information flow so you can see which channel to retire, which manager layer needs enablement, and whether a specific announcement actually landed. It is owned in practice by three roles: the Internal Comms lead, the HR business partner, and People Analytics.

People spend most of their week communicating, which is why small breaks compound quickly. Once you find the break, the work moves to improving workplace communication.

What a communication survey helps you decide
  • Which channel to retire because nobody reads it.
  • Which manager layer needs communication enablement.
  • Whether a specific announcement actually reached and landed.
  • Whether to change the cadence or format of updates.
88%

of a knowledge worker's week is spent communicating across multiple channels.

What is the difference between an employee communication survey, an engagement survey, and a communication audit?

A communication survey measures information flow, an engagement survey measures how people feel about work, and a communication audit is a one-off consultant review of channels, not a recurring survey. The table below shows which one to run, and when.

Communication surveyEngagement surveyCommunication audit
What it measuresWhether information reaches, is understood, and is believedHow people feel about their role, manager, and companyThe state of channels, assets, and governance
Who runs itInternal Comms lead with People AnalyticsHR or People teamA consultant or agency, one time
CadenceQuarterly pulse, plus event-triggeredAnnual or twice a yearOnce, or every few years
Typical length12 to 20 questions30 to 60 questionsInterviews and a channel inventory, not a survey
What it cannot tell youHow engaged or satisfied people areWhich specific message broke, or whereHow employees experience communication day to day

What an employee communication survey should measure: The six SIGNAL dimensions

An employee communication survey should measure six things, which spell SIGNAL: whether a message was Sent to a channel people use, whether it was Intelligible, whether it is Grounded in what people believe, whether it arrived Now rather than late, whether it was Applicable to the reader, and whether there is a Loop for them to respond.

The SIGNAL model
S

Sent

Did the message physically reach this person on a channel they actually use? Sent breaks first in frontline and multi-site organizations, where the office channels never touch the shop floor.

I

Intelligible

Did they understand it without having to ask someone what it meant? Intelligible breaks first in companies that grew past 500 without a communications function to edit the message.

G

Grounded

Do they believe it is true and complete? Grounded breaks first after a layoff or a missed target, when trust in the official version is thin.

N

Now

Did they hear it from the company before they heard it as a rumor? Now breaks first in organizations with a wide time-zone spread, where news outruns the update.

A

Applicable

Was it filtered for their role, site and shift, or did they get everyone's message? Applicable breaks first in enterprises with a single all-company channel.

L

Loop

Can they respond, and does anything visibly happen when they do? Loop breaks first anywhere that ran a survey and never published the result.

55+ employee communication survey questions, grouped by what they measure

The 55+ questions below are grouped across the six SIGNAL dimensions. Most teams should pick 12 to 20 of them for a quarterly pulse rather than running them all at once. Each question carries its answer type: a 0-10 scale statement, or an open-ended prompt.

Question Bank
SIGNAL dimensions
Sent: did it reach them
10 questions in this dimension
Sent questions measure whether messages physically reach each person on a channel they use. Sent breaks first in frontline and multi-site organizations, so pair this dimension with the delivery methods in the section on deskless workforce communication problems.
S01
I receive important company updates on a channel I actually check.
0-10
S02
Company announcements reach me before I hear about them informally.
0-10
S03
I know where to look when I need an official company update.
0-10
S04
Messages meant for my team actually reach everyone on it.
0-10
S05
I rarely miss an update because it went to a channel I do not use.
0-10
S06
The channels used for company communication suit how I work day to day.
0-10
S07
I can access company updates from the device I use most.
0-10
S08
Urgent messages reach me quickly enough for me to act on them.
0-10
S09
Which communication channel do you rely on most, and which do you ignore?
OPEN
S10
What is one message you found out about too late, and how did you hear it?
OPEN
Quick tipSent scores collapse fastest for people without a work email. Segment this dimension by desk-based versus frontline before you read the average.
Intelligible: did they understand
10 questions in this dimension
Intelligible questions measure whether people understood the message without asking someone. This dimension breaks first in companies that grew past 500 without a communications function.
I01
I understand company updates without having to ask someone to explain them.
0-10
I02
Company messages are written in plain language I can follow.
0-10
I03
When priorities change, I understand what it means for my own work.
0-10
I04
Leadership messages are specific enough for me to act on.
0-10
I05
I rarely have to guess what a company announcement actually means.
0-10
I06
The information I receive is concise rather than buried in detail.
0-10
I07
I know who to ask when a company message is unclear.
0-10
I08
Instructions I receive at work are clear the first time.
0-10
I09
What is one recent company message you found confusing, and why?
OPEN
I10
What would make company communication easier to understand?
OPEN
Grounded: do they believe it
10 questions in this dimension
Grounded questions measure whether people believe what they are told is true and complete. This dimension breaks first after a layoff or a missed target. If believability itself is the concern rather than information flow, run a dedicated employee trust survey alongside it, and pair it with work on transparency at work.
G01
I believe the information leadership shares with me is accurate.
0-10
G02
Company messages give the full picture rather than only the positive side.
0-10
G03
When leadership commits to something, I trust it will happen.
0-10
G04
I feel leadership is honest about the challenges the company faces.
0-10
G05
The reasons given for company decisions make sense to me.
0-10
G06
I trust that what I am told about changes affecting me is complete.
0-10
G07
Leadership communication is consistent from one message to the next.
0-10
G08
I rarely feel that important information is being withheld from me.
0-10
G09
When have you doubted the accuracy of a company message?
OPEN
G10
What would make you trust company communication more?
OPEN
Watch outGrounded scores drop hardest in the weeks after bad news. Read this dimension against what the company announced that quarter, not in isolation.
Now: did they hear it in time
10 questions in this dimension
Now questions measure whether people heard news from the company before they heard it as a rumor. This dimension breaks first in organizations with a wide time-zone spread. During a restructure or acquisition, use change management survey questions instead of this steady-state set.
N01
I hear about decisions that affect me from the company, not from rumors.
0-10
N02
Company updates reach me in time to prepare, not after the fact.
0-10
N03
I learn about changes to my work before they take effect.
0-10
N04
Communication keeps pace with how quickly things change here.
0-10
N05
I rarely feel like the last to know about something that affects me.
0-10
N06
Leadership addresses rumors quickly with clear information.
0-10
N07
The timing of company updates fits the decisions they describe.
0-10
N08
I get answers to pressing questions within a reasonable time.
0-10
N09
Describe a time you heard important news as a rumor first.
OPEN
N10
What update do you wish had reached you sooner?
OPEN
Applicable: was it filtered for them
10 questions in this dimension
Applicable questions measure whether messages were filtered for the reader's role, site, and shift. This dimension breaks first in enterprises with a single all-company channel.
A01
The updates I receive are relevant to my role.
0-10
A02
Communication is filtered for my team, site, or shift rather than sent to everyone.
0-10
A03
I rarely have to sift through messages that do not apply to me.
0-10
A04
Company communication reflects the realities of my day-to-day work.
0-10
A05
Updates about my location or team reach me specifically.
0-10
A06
I get the level of detail I need without being overloaded.
0-10
A07
The company tailors messages rather than sending one message to all.
0-10
A08
I can easily tell which updates require action from me.
0-10
A09
What kind of updates do you receive that are not relevant to your role?
OPEN
A10
What information about your team or site do you wish you received directly?
OPEN
Loop: can they respond
10 questions in this dimension
Loop questions measure whether people can respond and whether anything happens when they do. This dimension breaks first anywhere that ran a survey and never published the result. For how teams work together rather than how information reaches them, use team collaboration survey questions.
L01
I can share feedback about company communication easily.
0-10
L02
When I raise a question or concern, I get a response.
0-10
L03
I have seen visible action come from employee feedback.
0-10
L04
I feel safe giving honest feedback about how things are communicated.
0-10
L05
There is a clear way for me to respond to company updates.
0-10
L06
My input has influenced a decision that affects my work.
0-10
L07
Leadership acknowledges feedback even when nothing changes.
0-10
L08
I know what happened to the last feedback I gave.
0-10
L09
What is one thing you raised that led to a change?
OPEN
L10
When you give feedback and nothing happens, what stops you from giving it again?
OPEN
Quick tipLoop is the dimension most damaged by a silent survey. If you cannot commit to publishing results, expect this score to fall every cycle.

How many questions should an employee communication survey have?

Twelve to twenty questions for a quarterly communication pulse, and no more than thirty-five for an annual deep dive. Past thirty-five, completion rates fall faster than the extra data is worth, and the survey stops being something people finish on a break.

Headcount bandRecommended questionsCompletion timeCadence
Under 20010 to 14Under 4 minutesTwice a year
200 to 2,00012 to 204 to 5 minutesQuarterly pulse
2,000 and above12 to 20 pulse, up to 35 annual5 to 7 minutesQuarterly pulse plus annual deep dive

Under 200 people, a shorter survey run twice a year is usually the honest cadence, because the population cannot change fast enough between pulses to produce a different answer. Enterprises can run a short quarterly pulse and reserve the longer set for one annual deep dive.

What is a good response rate for an employee communication survey?

A strong desk-based communication survey clears 80%, an acceptable one sits around 45%, and anything under 30% is a warning that the survey itself has a communication problem. For frontline populations the bar is lower: 45% can be a genuinely strong result. Judge your number against your population type, not a single company-wide target.

39%
Prior
41%
Latest

41% of the more than 1.6 million federal employees invited to the U.S. survey completed it, up from 39% the year before.

Set your own baseline against your population, not a global average.

Population typeWeakAcceptableStrong
Desk-basedUnder 40%45 to 80%Above 80%
HybridUnder 35%40 to 55%Above 55%
Frontline / desklessUnder 25%30 to 45%Above 45%
  1. People do not believe it is anonymous: use an anonymous employee feedback tool with visible response thresholds and explain them before launch.
  2. The last survey produced no visible action: publish results and one concrete change from the previous cycle before you open the next one.
  3. It was sent on a channel the population does not check: match the channel to the audience, especially for frontline teams.
  4. It is too long for the shift or the commute: cut to 12 to 20 questions so it finishes in under five minutes.
  5. Managers were not briefed: if nobody told the team it mattered, response rates fall regardless of the tool.
Francesca Bacciri
HR Business Partner, WeRoad
Case study
WeRoad
The most outstanding part was the partnership with the solution manager, one to one. Not only before the survey, during the survey, and post the survey. I felt like we could do this very successfully from day one.
90.5%
survey participation, their highest to date
63
managers working their own team results
6
countries in one survey cycle
1 month
from new HRBP to company-wide survey

Running an employee communication survey: A six-step sequence

To run an employee communication survey, pick the decision it must inform, select 12 to 20 questions across the six dimensions, brief managers before launch, launch on the channel each population uses, read the spread across org levels before the average, then publish three numbers and two actions within sixty days.

  1. 01

    Pick the decision the survey has to inform

    Name the decision the results will change before writing a single question. A survey with no decision attached produces a report nobody acts on.

  2. 02

    Select 12 to 20 questions across the six dimensions

    Choose questions covering Sent, Intelligible, Grounded, Now, Applicable and Loop, rather than loading in every question you can think of.

  3. 03

    Brief managers before launch, not after

    Managers who hear about the survey from their team rather than from HR will not promote it, and response rates fall as a direct result.

  4. 04

    Launch on the channel each population actually uses

    Email for desk-based staff, QR codes or SMS for frontline and deskless staff, with the window held open across time zones and shift patterns.

  5. 05

    Read the spread across org levels before the average

    Segment the same question by executive, people manager and individual contributor. The gap between levels is more diagnostic than the company average.

  6. 06

    Publish three numbers and two actions within sixty days

    Share three headline results unedited, name two actions with owners and dates, state what will not change and why, then publish what actually shipped along with what stalled.

See how well communication really works

Run employee communication surveys across email, Slack, Teams, WhatsApp, SMS, and QR codes for deskless teams. Built-in anonymity thresholds, org-level segmentation, and action tracking, so you catch a breakdown before it costs you.

How do you survey frontline and deskless employees who have no work email?

Reach frontline and deskless employees with QR codes on posters and kiosks at the point of work, with SMS, and with shared-tablet huddle sessions, all with no login and no email address required, run on the shift pattern rather than the office week. This branch is one of the hardest parts of deskless workforce communication problems.

Delivery methodSetupAnonymityBest-fit workforceWindow
QR poster at the point of workLowStrong (personal phone)Manufacturing, warehousing1 to 2 weeks
Kiosk or shared tabletMediumWeaker (shared device)Retail, hospitality1 week
SMSLowStrongField and delivery teams3 to 5 days
WhatsAppMediumStrongDistributed and multi-site1 week
Shift-huddle facilitated sessionHighWeaker (in group)Healthcare, shift-basedSame shift

Match the method to the shift pattern in manufacturing, retail, hospitality, and healthcare, and remember that anonymity perception is weaker on a shared tablet than on a personal-phone QR scan. That is a real trade-off, not a footnote. See the wider picture in manufacturing workforce communication challenges.

CultureMonkey Customer Story
Heather Kane
Change Management & Employee Engagement Lead, Robertshaw
Robertshaw
Manufacturing · 4,500+ employees · 14 sites globally
The problem CultureMonkey solves is getting to a mostly frontline workforce in nine different languages, half a dozen of which aren't common. It makes it really easy, so we can spend more of our time on the output that actually matters.
4x
eNPS growth
71%
fewer actively disengaged
8.7
engagement score
84%+
managers rated 8+
Read case study

How do you run a communication survey across multiple countries and languages?

For a global enterprise, run one survey authored in a single source language, translated rather than re-authored, delivered in each employee's preferred language, and reported by country before it is reported globally. Smaller, single-country readers can skip this section.

Phase 1
Write it once
  1. 1Author the survey in one source language so every version says the same thing.
  2. 2Translate rather than re-author, so a question means the same thing in every market.
Phase 2
Localize it
  1. 3Set each employee's preferred language on import, not at launch.
  2. 4Translate the response scale as well as the question text.
  3. 5Check that the scale direction survives translation, so agree stays on the same end.
Phase 3
Launch and read
  1. 6Hold the launch window open across time zones so no region gets a shorter run.
  2. 7Report by country before you report globally, because a global average hides national breaks.

Why do communication survey scores look fine when communication is clearly broken?

Communication survey scores look fine when communication is broken because the company average hides a Cascade Gap: leadership scores its own clarity high, the frontline scores it low, and the two cancel out in the middle. Reading only the average tells you nothing. Reading the spread between org levels tells you where the message is dying.

The Cascade Gap test
15+
point gap between how executives and frontline staff rate the same question means the message is breaking down at managers, not the channel it was sent on.
  1. 1.Ask the same clarity question at three org levels: executive, people manager, and individual contributor.
  2. 2.Read the spread between the levels, not the company average.
  3. 3.If the executive-to-individual-contributor gap is wider than 15 points, the message is dying at the manager relay layer, not the channel. Another all-hands will not fix a relay problem.
  4. Most teams never see this because they never segment their own results by org level.
Worked example
Same clarity question, scored at three org levels: "I understand how this quarter's priorities change what my team works on."
Org levelScoreCascade gapReading
Executive84baselineThe message is clear at the top
People manager7113 vs execIt is already thinning at the relay layer
Individual contributor5826 vs execThe message is dying before it reaches the work
7 in 10

70% of the variance in team engagement is determined solely by the manager, which is why a message that clears the executive layer can still die at the manager relay.

Source: Gallup

What are the most important employee communication metrics to track?

The six metrics worth tracking over time are the message clarity score, the cascade gap, the channel reach rate, time-to-hear, the response-to-action rate, and the survey response rate. Track the same ones every cycle so the trend, not a single reading, tells the story.

0.55 out of 1.0 is how closely communication tracks eNPS, one of the strongest links of any engagement driver, just behind growth and development. A slipping communication score is an early warning for engagement as a whole.

MetricWhat it measuresHow to calculateHealthy rangeOwner
Message clarity scoreWhether people understand updatesAverage of Intelligible questions, 0 to 100Above 75Internal Comms
Cascade gapWhere the message diesThe executives' average score minus the frontline employees' average scoreUnder 15 pointsPeople Analytics
Channel reach rateWhether messages arriveShare reporting they saw a given updateAbove 80%Internal Comms
Time-to-hearTiming of updatesDays from decision to employees learning itUnder 3 daysInternal Comms
Response-to-action rateWhether the loop closesShare of raised issues with a visible actionAbove 50%CHRO
Survey response rateTrust in the instrumentResponses divided by invitedsee bandPeople Analytics

What do you do after an employee communication survey?

After an employee communication survey, close it, read the spread across levels, publish the headline numbers unedited, name two actions with owners, say what will not change and why, then publish what actually shipped along with what stalled, all inside sixty days. The follow-through, not the fieldwork, is what earns the next response rate.

After the survey closes
The 60-day close-the-loop clock
  1. Day 0Close the survey.
  2. Day 5Read the spread across org levels, not just the average.
  3. Day 10Publish the three headline numbers unedited. This is where you can also link to how you share survey results with employees.
  4. Day 20Name two actions with owners and dates, and publish what will not change and why. Saying so plainly does more for the next response rate than promising two more things that will, and it is the heart of closing the communication feedback loop.
  5. Day 60Publish what actually shipped, and be just as plain about the actions that stalled or could not be delivered. Reporting the misses alongside the wins is what earns the next survey's response rate.
Symphone'e Lindsey, Head of Human Resources, GTM at Twilio
Symphone'e Lindsey
Head of Human Resources, GTM, Twilio
CultureClub X·S06 E07
When they see nothing happen, responses become checkbox exercises. The discipline is not just in collecting data. It is in being accountable for what you do with it.

What can an employee communication survey not tell you?

An employee communication survey cannot tell you why a score moved, whether a channel is being ignored or simply unread, what a specific team's real blocker is, or what finally made someone leave. Read it alongside the listening inputs you already have.

The survey misses
Why a score moved this quarter
The listening input that catches it
Skip-level conversations
The survey misses
Whether a channel is ignored or just unread
The listening input that catches it
Channel analytics
The survey misses
A specific team's real blocker
The listening input that catches it
Manager one-to-ones
The survey misses
What finally made someone leave
The listening input that catches it
Exit interviews

Triangulating the survey with those four inputs is a large part of why employee surveys matter in the first place.

What tools can you use to run an employee communication survey?

You can run an employee communication survey with a dedicated employee survey platform, an internal comms platform that includes a survey module, a general-purpose survey tool, or an intranet-embedded survey. What separates them is less the questionnaire and more whether they can reach every worker type and segment results by org level.

Six things to look for
  • Reach: reaches every worker type, including people with no work email.
  • Trusted anonymity: protects anonymity in a way employees actually believe.
  • Language: supports the languages the workforce reads.
  • Org-level segmentation: segments results by org level, so a cascade gap is visible.
  • Trending: tracks the same question across survey cycles.
  • Action tracking: turns findings into assigned actions rather than a static PDF.

Once you know what to ask, compare platforms against those criteria in our roundup of employee engagement survey tools. Dedicated survey platforms tend to lead on segmentation and anonymity, internal comms platforms on channel reach, and general-purpose tools on price rather than depth.

How does CultureMonkey help you run employee communication surveys?

CultureMonkey runs employee communication surveys with QR-only surveys for deskless teams who have no work email, multilingual delivery in each employee's own language, org-hierarchy reporting that makes a cascade gap visible, survey-over-survey heatmaps to track a question across cycles, context-aware AI analysis of open-text comments, and an actions map that gives every finding an owner and a due date.

QR-only surveys
Surveys built purely for on-site participation via QR codes on posters, kiosks, and at events. Enabling it disables digital notifications, which is what makes it work for deskless and offline populations.
Multilingual delivery in 100+ languages
Launch and reminder emails in each participant's preferred language across 100+ languages, set per employee on CSV import, with editable in-platform translations of survey response elements.
Organization hierarchy and job levels
Model the reporting structure so results can be read by org level, which is what makes a cascade gap visible in the first place.
Survey-over-survey heatmap comparison
A one-click heatmap that overlays two cycles and colour-codes each question and team by how much it rose or fell, so you see where communication improved and where it slipped.
Context-aware AI feedback analysis
Sentiment and topic extraction that reads each comment in the context of the question that was asked.
Actions navigation map and owner filters
A visual map of the five action-status columns with live task counts, and filtering of actions by owner, so the sixty-day clock has somewhere to live.

Conclusion

Employee communication survey questions measure how information moves through a company: whether messages are sent to the right channel, understood, believed, timely, relevant, and open to a response. A good set is not the longest one. It is the one that covers those six dimensions with enough questions to be balanced and few enough that people finish it.

This guide gave you what you need to run one well: the six SIGNAL dimensions, 55+ questions grouped across six dimensions, the response-rate benchmark to judge your result against, a six-step run sequence with named owners, the Cascade Gap test for reading the spread across org levels, and the sixty-day clock for closing the loop.

CultureMonkey is built for this workflow. QR-only surveys reach deskless teams with no email, multilingual delivery meets every employee in their language, org-hierarchy reporting makes cascade gaps visible, and the actions map turns findings into owned work.

Frequently asked questions

There is no real difference. Both names describe a structured questionnaire that measures how information moves through an organization. "Internal communications survey" is the term communications teams tend to use, while "employee communication survey" is the HR-facing name. The questions, dimensions, and cadence are the same.
Aim for under five minutes. A quarterly communication pulse of 12 to 20 questions fits comfortably in that window, which is short enough for someone to finish on a break or between shifts. Anything past 35 questions pushes completion time high enough that response rates start to fall.
Yes. Employees answer honestly about whether they believe what leadership tells them only when they trust the survey is anonymous. Use a tool with response thresholds that suppress small segments, and explain the anonymity rules before launch. Perceived anonymity is the single biggest lever on your response rate.
You can, with a spreadsheet and a form, but you lose anonymity thresholds, org-level segmentation, and multilingual delivery. Without segmentation you cannot spot a cascade gap, and without thresholds employees will not trust that responses are private. A dedicated tool matters most once you are past about 50 people.
A cascade gap is the difference in how the same clarity question scores at different org levels. Ask executives, people managers, and individual contributors the same question, then read the spread. A gap wider than 15 points means the message is dying at the manager relay layer rather than at the channel.
Within two weeks. A reorganization, acquisition, return-to-office change, or leadership transition resets what employees believe and how they hear about decisions. An event-triggered pulse in the first two weeks catches confusion and rumor while you can still correct them, rather than waiting for the next quarterly cycle.
Two to four per dimension for a quarterly pulse. This guide groups 55+ questions across six dimensions so you can choose. Covering all six dimensions with a few questions each gives you a balanced read; going deep on one or two dimensions makes sense only when you are chasing a specific problem.
Run a quarterly pulse of 12 to 20 questions, an annual deep dive of up to 35, and an event-triggered pulse within two weeks of any restructure, acquisition, return-to-office change, or leadership transition. Under 200 people, quarterly is usually too often, and twice a year is the honest cadence. Communication breaks quietly, so a short, frequent pulse catches the break while you can still fix it, rather than at the next annual cycle.
Ownership is usually shared. The Internal Comms lead owns the questions and the narrative, People Analytics owns segmentation and analysis, the HR business partner briefs managers, and the CHRO owns the actions that follow. In smaller companies without an internal comms function, HR owns the whole cycle.

Find where communication breaks down

Reach every employee, including deskless teams with no email, in their own language. Segment by org level to see the cascade gap, and turn findings into owned actions. Book a demo to run your first communication survey.